Missing Person
Melinda McGhee
Melinda McGhee, 31, has been missing since March 24, 2003. Her NamUs case is open and unresolved, with the Escambia County Sheriff’s Office listed as the primary investigating agency.
- Incident date
- March 24, 2003
- Location
- Atmore, Escambia County
- Independent sources
- 1
The record
Melinda McGhee
Melinda McGhee was 31 when she went missing on March 24, 2003. Her NamUs case remains open and unresolved 1.
The record asks anyone who has seen McGhee or knows her whereabouts to contact the Escambia County Sheriff’s Office. It also requests information about any suspicious person or vehicle observed on March 24, 2003, in or around Kent Road in Atmore, Alabama 1.
The Escambia County Sheriff’s Office is the primary investigating agency 1.
Timeline
- Confirmed
Melinda McGhee was reported in the NamUs record as missing from this date. The record seeks information about suspicious people or vehicles seen in or around Kent Road in Atmore, Alabama, that day.
Documented claims
Melinda McGhee was 31 at the time of the incident.
ConfirmedSource: U.S. Department of Justice NamUs · Single-source claim.
Melinda McGhee has been missing since March 24, 2003.
ConfirmedSource: U.S. Department of Justice NamUs · Single-source claim.
The NamUs case is open and unresolved.
ConfirmedSource: U.S. Department of Justice NamUs · Single-source claim.
NamUs requests information from anyone who has seen McGhee or knows her whereabouts.
ConfirmedSource: U.S. Department of Justice NamUs · Single-source claim.
NamUs also requests information about any suspicious person or vehicle observed on March 24, 2003, in or around Kent Road in Atmore, Alabama.
ConfirmedSource: U.S. Department of Justice NamUs · Single-source claim.
The Escambia County Sheriff’s Office is the primary investigating agency.
ConfirmedSource: U.S. Department of Justice NamUs · Single-source claim.
Sources
- NamUs Missing Person Case MP5022: Melinda McGhee — U.S. Department of Justice NamUsOpen
Single official source. This entry is documented strictly from one official record. No independent reporting on this case was found. Details beyond the record are unverified and deliberately omitted.
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion, share a tip, or ask a question about this case.
Sign in