Missing Person
Bryan Dorminey
NamUs lists Bryan Russell Dorminey, 41, as missing after he was last seen in Chilton County; the open case is investigated by the Shelby County Sheriff’s Office.
- Incident date
- Not documented
- Location
- Chilton County
- Independent sources
- 1
The record
Bryan Russell Dorminey
Bryan Russell Dorminey was 41 years old at the time of his disappearance. He was last seen in Chilton County, Alabama, according to NamUs. The record states that he was believed to have been involved in an altercation in Shelby, Alabama, in Shelby County. The record does not provide a date of last contact or a physical description. His case, MP83849, is listed as open and unresolved. The Shelby County Sheriff’s Office is the primary investigating agency. 1
Documented claims
Bryan Russell Dorminey was 41 years old at the time of the incident.
ConfirmedSource: U.S. Department of Justice NamUs · Single-source claim.
Dorminey was last seen in Chilton County, Alabama.
ConfirmedSource: U.S. Department of Justice NamUs · Single-source claim.
Dorminey was believed to have been involved in an altercation in Shelby, Alabama, in Shelby County.
ConfirmedSource: U.S. Department of Justice NamUs · Single-source claim.
The NamUs record does not provide a date of last contact.
ConfirmedSource: U.S. Department of Justice NamUs · Single-source claim.
The supplied NamUs record does not provide a physical description.
ConfirmedSource: U.S. Department of Justice NamUs · Single-source claim.
NamUs case MP83849 is listed as open and unresolved.
ConfirmedSource: U.S. Department of Justice NamUs · Single-source claim.
The Shelby County Sheriff’s Office is the primary investigating agency.
ConfirmedSource: U.S. Department of Justice NamUs · Single-source claim.
Sources
- NamUs Missing Person Case MP83849 — Bryan Russell Dorminey — U.S. Department of Justice NamUsOpen
Single official source. This entry is documented strictly from one official record. No independent reporting on this case was found. Details beyond the record are unverified and deliberately omitted.
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion, share a tip, or ask a question about this case.
Sign in